Skip to content

Annals of Clinical and Analytical Medicine

E-ISSN: 2667-663X · Monthly · English

Immune response characteristics and tiered treatment for secondary immune thrombocytopenia with different types of infection

Immune response and tiered treatment for SITP with infections

Declarations

Ethics Declarations

Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Qilu Medical University (Approval No: YXLL2023019).

Animal and Human Rights Statement

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments.

Informed Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to patient privacy reasons but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding

This work was supported by the General Programs of Qilu Medical University (grant number X24ZKZD01, JCYXKFFC202401, X24ZKMS06, JCYXKFFC202404, and JCYXKFPY202407).

Author Contributions (CRediT Taxonomy)

Conceptualization: L.S., W.C.

Investigation: W.C., Y.L., L.Z., J.W.

Data Curation: W.C., Y.L.

Writing – Original Draft Preparation: W.C.

Writing – Review & Editing: L.S., L.W., S.L.

Visualization: H.X.

Supervision: L.S.

References

  1. Mititelu A, Onisai MC, Rosca A, Vladareanu AM. Current understanding of immune thrombocytopenia: a review of pathogenesis and treatment options. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(4):2163. doi:10.3390/ijms25042163
  2. Goncalves I, Lewis C, Grainger B, Dring R, Lee N, Pasricha SR, et al. Thrombosis in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: incidence, risk, and clinical outcomes. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024;8(1):102342.
  3. Provan D, Arnold DM, Bussel JB, Chong BH, Cooper N, Gernsheimer T, et al. Updated international consensus report on the investigation and management of primary immune thrombocytopenia. Blood Adv. 2019;3(22):3780-3817. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000812
  4. Delshad M, Davoodi-Moghaddam Z, Pourbagheri-Sigaroodi A, Faranoush M, Abolghasemi H, Bashash D. Translating mechanisms into therapeutic strategies for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP): lessons from clinical trials. Thromb Res. 2024;235:125-147.
  5. Gonzalez-Lopez TJ, Provan D, Barez A, et al. Primary and secondary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP): time for a rethink. Blood Rev. 2023;61:101112.
  6. Yazdanbakhsh K, Provan D, Semple JW. The role of T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells in refractory immune thrombocytopenia. Br J Haematol. 2023;203(1):54-61.
  7. Malik A, Sayed AA, Han P, et al. The role of CD8+ T-cell clones in immune thrombocytopenia. Blood. 2023;141(20):2417-2429.
  8. Provan D, Semple JW. Recent advances in the mechanisms and treatment of immune thrombocytopenia. EBioMedicine. 2022;76:103820.
  9. Ghanima W, Cooper N, Rodeghiero F, Godeau B, Bussel JB. Thrombopoietin receptor agonists: ten years later. Haematologica. 2019;104(6):1112-1123. doi:10.3324/haematol.2018.212845
  10. Bussel JB, Arnold DM, Boxer MA, et al. Long-term fostamatinib treatment of adults with immune thrombocytopenia during the phase 3 clinical trial program. Am J Hematol. 2019;94(5):546-553.
  11. Langrish CL, Bradshaw JM, Francesco MR, et al. Preclinical efficacy and anti-inflammatory mechanisms of action of the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor rilzabrutinib for immune-mediated disease. J Immunol. 2021;206(7):1454-1468.
  12. Sun L, Han B, Wu Q, et al. Immune mechanism and clinical significance of macrophage to medullary hematopoietic injury of immune-related hematocytopenia patients. Chin Med J (Engl). 2013;126(24):4696-4702.
  13. Galgano L, Guidetti GF, Torti M, Canobbio I. The controversial role of LPS in platelet activation in vitro. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(18):10900. doi:10.3390/ijms231810900
  14. Sun YX, Feng Q, Wang SW, Li X, Sheng Z, Peng J. HLA-G-ILT2 interaction contributes to suppression of bone marrow B cell proliferation in acquired aplastic anemia. Ann Hematol. 2022;101(4):739-748.
  15. Cuker A, Neunert CE. How I treat refractory immune thrombocytopenia. Blood. 2016;128(12):1547-1554.
  16. Cooper N, Ghanima W. Immune thrombocytopenia. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(10):945-955. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp1810479
  17. Sun L, Wu Q, Han B, et al. Mechanisms of immune injury and heterogeneity of bone marrow hematopoietic cells island in patients with auto-immuno-related hematocytopenia. J Immunoassay Immunochem. 2014;35(4):378-387.
  18. Ezzeroug Ezzraimi A, Hannachi N, Mariotti A, Rolain JM, Camoin-Jau L. Platelets and Escherichia coli: a complex interaction. Biomedicines. 2022;10(7):1636. doi:10.3390/biomedicines10071636
  19. Siggins MK, Sriskandan S. Bacterial lymphatic metastasis in infection and immunity. Cells. 2021;11(1):33. doi:10.3390/cells11010033
  20. Crickx E, Chappert P, Sokal A, et al. Rituximab-resistant splenic memory B cells and newly engaged naive B cells fuel relapses in patients with immune thrombocytopenia. Sci Transl Med. 2021;13(589):eabc3961. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abc3961
  21. Porcelijn L, Huiskes E, Oldert G, Schipperus M, Zwaginga JJ, de Haas M. Detection of platelet autoantibodies to identify immune thrombocytopenia: state of the art. Br J Haematol. 2018;182(3):423-436.
  22. Kamhieh-Milz J, Ghosoun N, Sterzer V, Salama A. Effect of glucocorticoid treatment on BAFF and APRIL expression in patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Clin Immunol. 2018;188:74-80.
  23. Liu Z, Hu X, Liang Y, et al. Glucocorticoid signaling and regulatory T cells cooperate to maintain the hair-follicle stem-cell niche. Nat Immunol. 2022;23(7):1086-1097.
  24. . Kaye J. Integrating T cell activation signals to regulate gene expression through cyclosporin-sensitive NFAT. J Immunol. 2023;211(3):323-324.

Figures

Figure 1. Lymphocyte subsets in peripheral blood among non-SITP patients and SITP patients were analyzed by FACS. In dot plots (A), (C), and (E), lymphocytes are gated by their CD4 and CD8 expression to separate CD4 single positive (gated by an orange line), CD8 single positive (gated by a green line), and CD4/CD8 double positive (gated by a blue line) T cells. Similarly, in dot plots (B), (D), and (F), lymphocytes are gated on the basis of CD19 and CD16/CD56 expression to separate B cells (gated by a purple line) and NK T cells (gated by a blue line). Cell

Figure 1. Lymphocyte subsets in peripheral blood among non-SITP patients and SITP patients were analyzed by FACS. In dot plots (A), (C), and (E), lymphocytes are gated by their CD4 and CD8 expression to separate CD4 single positive (gated by an orange line), CD8 single positive (gated by a green line), and CD4/CD8 double positive (gated by a blue line) T cells. Similarly, in dot plots (B), (D), and (F), lymphocytes are gated on the basis of CD19 and CD16/CD56 expression to separate B cells (gated by a purple line) and NK T cells (gated by a blue line). Cell

Figure 2. Destruction of bone marrow megakaryocytes and platelets by activation of humoral immune response in SITP patients with E. coli infection. (A) Wright’s staining of bone marrow showing naked megakaryocytes. Immunofluorescence staining showing anti-human IgG positive megakaryocyte (B) and activated Mφ with high expression of Fc gamma receptor I (FcγRI) (C)

Figure 2. Destruction of bone marrow megakaryocytes and platelets by activation of humoral immune response in SITP patients with E. coli infection. (A) Wright’s staining of bone marrow showing naked megakaryocytes. Immunofluorescence staining showing anti-human IgG positive megakaryocyte (B) and activated Mφ with high expression of Fc gamma receptor I (FcγRI) (C)

Figure 3. Destruction of bone marrow megakaryocytes and platelets by activation of cellular immune response in SITP patients with HBV infection. (A) Wright’s staining of bone marrow shows megakaryocytes being attacked by lymphocytes. Immunofluorescence staining showing anti-human IgG negative megakaryocyte (B) and activated Mφ with sparse expression of Fc gamma receptor I (FcγRI) (C)

Figure 3. Destruction of bone marrow megakaryocytes and platelets by activation of cellular immune response in SITP patients with HBV infection. (A) Wright’s staining of bone marrow shows megakaryocytes being attacked by lymphocytes. Immunofluorescence staining showing anti-human IgG negative megakaryocyte (B) and activated Mφ with sparse expression of Fc gamma receptor I (FcγRI) (C)

Tables

Table 1. Effect of pathogen infections on the concentration of platelet antibodies in SITP patients

Table 1. Effect of pathogen infections on the concentration of platelet antibodies in SITP patients

Table 2. Effect of pathogen infections on the percentage of peripheral lymphocyte subsets in SITP patients

Table 2. Effect of pathogen infections on the percentage of peripheral lymphocyte subsets in SITP patients

About This Article

How to Cite This Article

Weitong Cui, Yajun Liang, Lifei Sun, Lei Wei, Shuai Li, Linlin Zhang, Junwei Wang, Huaru Xue, Jinbiao Zhang, Qiangqiang Wu. Immune response characteristics and tiered treatment for secondary immune thrombocytopenia with different types of infection. Ann Clin Anal Med 2026;17(3):190-195. doi:10.4328/ACAM.22684

Publication History

Received:
30.03.2025
Accepted:
02.06.2025
Published Online:
07.07.2025
Printed:
01.03.2026