Skip to content

Annals of Clinical and Analytical Medicine

E-ISSN: 2667-663X · Monthly · English

Association of naples score with syntax score in patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction

Naples score and syntax score

Abstract

AimThis retrospective observational study aimed to investigate the relationship between the Naples prognostic score (NS) and SYNTAX score (SS) in patients diagnosed with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), focusing on their implications for coronary artery disease (CAD) severity.MethodsData were collected from 300 consecutive NSTEMI patients who underwent coronary angiography between January 2024 and May 2024. NS, calculated from serum albumin, total cholesterol, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR), was assessed alongside SS, which quantifies CAD complexity based on angiographic findings.ResultsNS was significantly higher in patients with more extensive CAD, as indicated by higher SS (p<0.05). This association underscores NS as a potential marker for predicting CAD severity in NSTEMI patients. Age was also noted to correlate significantly with higher NS, consistent with literature linking age to poorer nutritional status and cardiovascular outcomes.ConclusionThe findings of this study underscore the potential clinical relevance of the NS in patients with NSTEMI. NS, which integrates serum albumin levels, serum cholesterol levels, NLR, and LMR, emerged as significantly associated with the SS, a marker of CAD complexity. The study revealed that higher NS correlated with increased SS, suggesting that patients with poorer nutritional and inflammatory profiles may exhibit more extensive CAD. This association implies that NS could serve as a useful tool in risk stratification and management decisions for NSTEMI patients undergoing coronary angiography. Moreover, the study highlighted age and lipid profiles (triglycerides and LDL) as independent predictors of NS, further emphasizing the multifactorial nature of cardiovascular risk assessment in these patients.

Keywords

naples prognostic scoresyntax scorecoronary artery disease severity

Introduction

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity. The spectrum of ACS includes ST‑segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non‑ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and unstable angina.1 NSTEMI ACS, one of the types of ACS, is the result of partial occlusion of a coronary artery after rupture or erosion of a vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque.2
The Naples Prognostic Score (NS) is a multidimensional, comprehensive prognostic assessment system based on serum albumin levels, serum cholesterol levels, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR). This score can assess both the inflammatory and nutritional status of patients.3 While neutrophils contribute significantly to atherosclerotic plaque destabilization, neutrophil count can be influenced by variables such as blood volume.4 Lymphocytes and monocytes are key immune cells with important roles in the development of inflammation and atherosclerosis and influence prognosis in cases of myocardial infarction. Serum albumin is a negative acute phase reactant and its synthesis decreases and catabolism increases in response to inflammation.5-6
The SYNTAX Score (SS) is an angiographic scoring system that assesses the complexity of coronary artery disease (CAD).7 SS is recognized as a vital tool to guide decision‑making between coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and PCI.8 SS has been shown to aid revascularization decision‑making and predict mortality and morbidity in patients with CAD.9
In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between NS and SS in patients with NSTEMI in light of all these literature data.

Materials and Methods

For this retrospective observational analysis, we collected data from 300 consecutive non‑STEMI patients who underwent coronary angiography (CAG) between January 2024 and May 2024. Patients with active cancer, active autoimmune disease, active infections, and chronic kidney disease requiring hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis were excluded.
ACS, unstable angina, NSTEMI, and STEMI were defined as recommended in the latest universal myocardial infarction definition guideline.10 Demographic and clinical parameters were recorded from the hospital database. Biochemical analyses including complete blood count, serum creatinine, serum albumin, total cholesterol (TC), high‑density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL‑C), triglyceride (TG), and serum electrolyte levels were evaluated. Blood samples were collected at the time of admission to the emergency department.
Hypertension was defined as taking antihypertensive medication or having systolic blood pressure >140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure >90 mmHg. Diabetes mellitus (DM) was defined as fasting glucose level ≥126 mg/dL or receiving antidiabetic treatment.
Coronary angiography via femoral or radial access was performed for each patient. Two independent, experienced cardiologists individually evaluated the coronary angiographic images to calculate SS. Coronary arteries were assessed as 16 individual segments, and segments with 50% or greater luminal narrowing and ≥1.5 mm diameter were scored separately and combined to give a total score using the SS algorithm.
NS, serum albumin, and serum TC levels were calculated using NLR and LMR ratios as described in Table 1.Ethical ApprovalThis study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health Bursa City Hospital (Date: 29.05.2024, Decision No: 2024‑9/7).Statistical AnalysisStatistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA). Pearson chi‑square test was used for categorical variables. The conformity of numerical variables to normal distribution was analyzed by statistical methods including the Kolmogorov‑Smirnov test. Mann‑Whitney U test was applied for non‑normally distributed variables and Student’s t test was applied for normally distributed variables.
Data are expressed as ‘mean ( ± standard deviation)’ for normally distributed and ‘median (minimum–maximum)’ for non‑normally distributed; categorical variables are expressed as ‘n (%)’. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed for independent predictors of Naples Prognostic Score. p<0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The mean age of the 300 patients included in the study sample, of whom 31.3% were female, was 63 ( ± 10) years. 62.6% (n=188) of the patients had a Naples score of 0, 1, or 2 (Group 1). The distribution of the demographic, clinical, and angiographic characteristics of patients by groups is shown in Table 2.
In Group 2, compared to Group 1, age was significantly higher, while the smoking rate and EF were significantly lower (Table 1) (p<0.05). In patients with a high Naples score (Group 2), the SYNTAX score was significantly higher compared to Group 1 [9 (1.0–26.5) – 12 (2.0–37.0); p<0.001] (Table 2).
The distribution of the laboratory test results by the groups is shown in Table 2. In Group 2, the levels of neutrophils and NLR were significantly higher compared to Group 1, while the levels of lymphocytes, LMR, triglycerides, total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, and albumin were significantly lower (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in other blood parameters (Table 2).
Univariable logistic regression analysis revealed that age, tobacco, EF, SYNTAX score, hemoglobin, triglyceride, HDL, LDL, BUN, and creatinine were significantly associated with Naples score (Table 3). Further analysis of these variables with multivariable logistic regression analyses indicated that age, SYNTAX score, triglycerides, and LDL were independent predictors of Naples score (p<0.05) (Table 3).

Discussion

This study revealed that NS was significantly higher in NSTEMI patients who underwent CAG and had more extensive coronary artery disease. NS was positively correlated with SS.
Older age was also found to be significantly higher in Group 2 patients. In the literature, age has been shown to be significantly associated with poor nutritional status, which is consistent with our study.11
Hypoalbuminemia may be a risk factor for cardiovascular disease due to its detrimental pleiotropic effects on the cardiovascular system and the body.12 Studies show that serum albumin levels are a reliable predictor of cardiovascular disease and are inversely associated with ischemic heart disease.13 In another study, it was found that patients with low preoperative albumin levels had worse long‑term survival after coronary artery bypass graft surgery compared to patients with normal albumin levels. The underlying cause may be related to the patient’s preoperative nutritional status, immune status, or both.14
Malnutrition has been investigated with increasing interest in recent years and is one of the hallmarks of frailty. Initially, malnutrition was thought to be predictive of poor clinical outcomes in cancer patients and various scores were developed to identify this condition, but in recent years, malnutrition has also been associated with mortality, morbidity, and disease severity in cardiovascular diseases.15
Previous studies have shown that NS can independently predict in‑hospital mortality in STEMI.16 Patients with high NS who underwent successful percutaneous intervention for NSTEMI had a higher composite major adverse cardiac event (MACE) of non‑fatal recurrent myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular event, and all‑cause death at one‑year follow‑up, and high NS was found to be a predictor of MACE.17 However, the association between NS and CAD severity in patients with NSTEMI has not been clearly established.
Naples Prognostic Score is calculated using serum albumin and serum TC levels, NLR, and LMR ratios.18 Neutrophils can secrete prooxidant and prothrombotic substances that can lead to endothelial damage and platelet aggregation, resulting in acute coronary syndromes. Low lymphocyte count has been associated with poor prognosis in patients with CAD and unstable angina.19 NLR has been found to be useful to differentiate patients at high risk of CVD events and more severe CAD.20 Monocytes actively bind to platelets to form thrombotic monocyte‑platelet aggregates, which are increased in STEMI.21 Low lymphocyte count and high monocyte count have been associated with adverse cardiovascular endpoints in CAD patients.22 Gong et al. found LMR to be an independent predictor of severe coronary atherosclerosis.23 LMR has also been reported to be an effective predictor in patients with carotid artery stenosis and coronary atherosclerosis.24 In another study, LMR was found to be an independent predictor of CAD severity in patients with stable CAD undergoing CAG.25
Our findings reveal an association between NLR and LMR levels and severe CAD.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our study demonstrates a significant correlation between the NS and SS in patients with NSTEMI. The elevated NS in patients with more extensive coronary artery disease, as assessed by SS, highlights its potential as a valuable prognostic tool in NSTEMI management. Integrating NS alongside SS could enhance risk assessment and guide personalized treatment strategies for better patient outcomes. Further research is needed to validate these findings and explore the mechanistic links between NS and SS in cardiovascular disease.

References

  1. Khan AR, Golwala H, Tripathi A, et al. Impact of total occlusion of culprit artery in acute non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(41):3082-3089. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx418
  2. Bouisset F, Ruidavets JB, Dallongeville J, et al. Comparison of short- and long-term prognosis between ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Clin Med. 2021;10(2):180. doi:10.3390/jcm10020180
  3. Oner E, Kahraman S, Agus HZ, et al. Naples score is associated with SYNTAX score in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Coron Artery Dis. 2023;34(7):504-509. doi:10.1097/mca.0000000000001278
  4. Zhang S, Diao J, Qi C, et al. Predictive value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018;18(1):75. doi:10.1186/s12872-018-0812-6
  5. Quan XQ, Wang RC, Zhang Q, Zhang CT, Sun L. The predictive value of lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in the prognosis of acute coronary syndrome patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020;20(1):338. doi:10.1186/s12872-020-01614-x
  6. Eckart A, Struja T, Kutz A, et al. Relationship of nutritional status, inflammation, and serum albumin levels during acute illness: a prospective study. Am J Med. 2020;133(6):713-722.e7. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.10.031
  7. Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP, et al. The SYNTAX score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention. 2005;1(2):219-227.
  8. Li M, Liu X, Jiang M, et al. Prognostic capability of clinical SYNTAX score in patients with complex coronary artery disease and chronic renal insufficiency undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024;25(1):18. doi:10.31083/j.rcm2501018
  9. Wykrzykowska JJ, Garg S, Girasis C, et al. Value of the SYNTAX score for risk assessment in the all-comers population of the randomized multicenter LEADERS (Limus Eluted from A Durable versus ERodable Stent coating) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(4):272-277. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.044
  10. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Circulation. 2018;138(20).
  11. Donini LM, Stephan BC, Rosano A, et al. What are the risk factors for malnutrition in older-aged institutionalized adults? Nutrients. 2020;12(9):2857. doi:10.3390/nu12092857
  12. Arques S. Serum albumin and cardiovascular disease: state-of-the-art review. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2020;69(4):192-200. doi:10.1016/j.ancard.2020.07.012
  13. Arques S. Human serum albumin in cardiovascular diseases. Eur J Intern Med. 2018;52:8-12. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2018.04.014
  14. de la Cruz KI, Bakaeen FG, Wang XL, et al. Hypoalbuminemia and long-term survival after coronary artery bypass: a propensity score analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91(3):671-675. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.09.004
  15. Demirci G, Aslan S, Güner A, et al. Clinical implication of the Naples prognostic score on transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024;103(1):219-225. doi:10.1002/ccd.30929
  16. Saygi M, Tanalp AC, Tezen O, et al. The prognostic importance of the Naples prognostic score for in-hospital mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Coron Artery Dis. 2024;35(1):31-37. doi:10.1097/mca.0000000000001285
  17. Birdal O, Pay L, Aksakal E, et al. Naples prognostic score and prediction of left ventricular ejection fraction in STEMI patients. Angiology. 2024;75(1):36-43. doi:10.1177/00033197231161903
  18. Galizia G, Lieto E, Auricchio A, et al. Naples prognostic score, based on nutritional and inflammatory status, is an independent predictor of long-term outcome in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60(12):1273-1284. doi:10.1097/dcr.0000000000000961
  19. Bhat T, Teli S, Rijal J, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and cardiovascular diseases: a review. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2013;11(1):55-59. doi:10.1586/erc.12.159
  20. Arbel Y, Finkelstein A, Halkin A, et al. Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio is related to the severity of coronary artery disease and clinical outcome in patients undergoing angiography. Atherosclerosis. 2012;225(2):456-460. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.09.009
  21. Adamstein NH, MacFadyen JG, Rose LM, et al. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and incident atherosclerotic events: analyses from 5 contemporary randomized trials. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(9):896-903. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa1034
  22. Núñez J, Miñana G, Bodí V, et al. Low lymphocyte count and cardiovascular diseases. Curr Med Chem. 2011;18(21):3226-3233.
  23. Gong S, Gao X, Xu F, et al. Association of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio with severity of coronary artery disease. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(43). doi:10.1097/md.0000000000012813
  24. Wu XB, Huang LX, Huang ZR, et al. The lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio predicts intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis plaque instability. Front Immunol. 2022;13:915126. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.915126
  25. Kose N, Akin F, Yildirim T, Ergun G, Altun I. The association between the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio and coronary artery disease severity in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019;23(6):2570-2575.

Tables

Table 1. Naples score

Calculation of Naples Score. LMR, lymphocyte to monocyte ratio; NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; NS, Naples Score

Table 2. Demographic, Clinical Characteristics and Laboratory Findings of Patients

Data are shown as mean±standard deviation, n (%) or median (minimum, maximum). CAD, Coronary artery disease; HDL-C, High-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LMR, lymphocyte monocyte ratio; NLR, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio; Post-PCI TIMI, Post- percutaneous coronary intervention thrombolysis in myocardial infarction; p

Table 3. Logistic Regression Analysis for Independent Predictors of Naples Prognostic Score

EF, Ejection fraction; HDL-C, High-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; BUN, Blood urea nitrogen; OR, Odds ratio; CI, Confidence interval; p

Additional Information

Publisher’s Note
Bayrakol MP remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional and institutional claims.

Rights and Permissions

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). To view a copy of the license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

About This Article

How to Cite This Article

Can Özkan, Yücel Kanal. Association of naples score with syntax score in patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. doi:10.4328/ACAM.22326

Publication History

Received:
06.07.2024
Accepted:
12.08.2024
Published Online:
06.10.2024
Printed:
01.11.2024