Abstract
Aim It has been reported that red cell distribution width (RDW) and hypertension are somehow related, but there is no well-established evidence about the probable relationship between RDW and preeclampsia. The present study aimed to determine whether RDW in the first trimester can be used to predict the presence and severity of preeclampsia.Methods This is a retrospective review of 57 healthy pregnant women, 42 women with mild preeclampsia, and 18 women with severe preeclampsia who delivered at the study center. These three groups were compared with respect to complete blood count parameters obtained during the first trimester.Results When compared with the control group, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, leukocyte count, RDW, blood urea nitrogen, and proteinuria were significantly higher in the severe preeclampsia group (respectively p<0.001, p<0.001, p=0.036, p<0.001, p<0.001, and p<0.001). The median RDW values of control, mild, and severe preeclampsia groups were 12.51% (range: 10.6-15.02%), 13.2% (range: 10.45-15.5%), and 13.7% (range: 11.9%-14.7%). RDW was significantly higher in the severe preeclampsia group than in the control group (p<0.001) and mild preeclampsia group (p=0.001). However, mild preeclampsia and control groups had statistically similar RDW values (p>0.05).Conclusion Increased RDW in the first trimester can be utilized to predict severe preeclampsia, but RDW values do not seem to correlate with the severity of preeclampsia.
Keywords
Additional Information
Publisher’s Note
Bayrakol MP remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional and institutional claims.
Rights and Permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). To view a copy of the license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
About This Article
How to Cite This Article
Çigdem Kunt Isguder, Mine Kanat Pektas, Osman Demir. Could red cell distribution width in the first trimester be used to predict preeclampsia?. J Clin Anal Med 2018;9(6):478-482. doi:10.4328/JCAM.5807
Publication History
- Received:
- 18.03.2018
- Accepted:
- 18.04.2018
- Published Online:
- 26.04.2018
- Printed:
- 01.11.2018