Skip to content

Annals of Clinical and Analytical Medicine

E-ISSN: 2667-663X · Monthly · English

Prevalence of helicobacter pylori infection and its histopathological correlation in adult celiac patients

Helicobacter pylori infection in adult celiac patients

Abstract

AimCeliac disease (CD) is a chronic autoimmune enteropathy associated with gluten intake in genetically predisposed individuals. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a common gastric pathogen, and its relationship with CD remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of H. pylori infection and its histopathological effects in adult CD patients.MethodsThis retrospective study includes patients diagnosed with CH at the Gastroenterology Clinic of Fırat University Hospital. Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of CH based on duodenal biopsy were included in the study. H. pylori status was determined by histological evaluation of gastric biopsies taken according to the Sidney protocol. Demographic, clinical, and histopathological data were obtained from patient files.ResultsA total of 216 CH patients were included in the study (174 [80.6%] H. pylori positive, 42 [19.4%] H. pylori negative). There were no significant differences in gender distribution and Marsh classification between the groups (p>0.05). Marsh 3A and 3B (31.6%) were the most common in H. pylori-positive cases, while Marsh 3B (38.1%) was the most common in H. pylori-negative cases. Chronic gastritis was observed at a high rate in both groups (positive 96%; negative 95.2%).ConclusionAlthough H. pylori infection is common in patients with Crohn’s disease, no significant effect on histopathological findings and Marsh stages has been detected. Our findings indicate that the effect of H. pylori on Crohn’s disease remains controversial and therefore requires large-scale, multicenter prospective studies.

Keywords

celiac diseasehelicobacter pylorimarsh classificationhistopathology

Introduction

Celiac disease is a chronic disorder that may develop at any stage of life in genetically predisposed individuals following the consumption of gluten-containing foods. Also referred to as gluten enteropathy, it is an immune-mediated condition characterized by a T-cell–driven immune response to gluten. Affecting approximately 1% of the global population, celiac disease represents a major public health concern due to its relatively high prevalence and potential for serious complications.1-2-3
Gluten-containing grains such as wheat, barley, and rye, as well as their derived products, trigger an abnormal immune reaction, resulting in both serological and histopathological alterations. These include the production of tissue transglutaminase, anti-gliadin, and anti-endomysial antibodies, as well as increased intraepithelial lymphocytes in the small intestinal mucosa, crypt hyperplasia, and villous atrophy. The importance of celiac disease has become increasingly recognized in recent decades, with current data indicating a prevalence of approximately 1.4% worldwide and a notable rise in incidence over the past forty years.4,5
At present, the cornerstone of management remains strict adherence to a gluten-free diet, which is often difficult to sustain in practice and poses considerable social challenges.6
Helicobacter pylori is a bacterium that colonizes the gastric mucosa and plays a well-established role in the pathogenesis of peptic ulcer disease, gastric carcinoma, and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma.7 However, its exact contribution to the etiology of dyspepsia, particularly functional dyspepsia, remains uncertain, as many infected patients fail to achieve symptom relief even after successful eradication therapy. This observation suggests the involvement of additional pathogenic mechanisms or host-related factors. Histological evaluation of gastric mucosa obtained through biopsy remains essential for detecting chronic inflammatory changes, atrophy, and other histopathological abnormalities that may not be visible on endoscopic examination alone.8-9-10-11
Genetic and environmental factors are known to play a role in the etiopathogenesis of celiac disease, while comorbid gastrointestinal conditions may also influence its course and clinical presentation. Among these, Helicobacter pylori infection can induce mucosal changes that resemble those observed in celiac disease, potentially leading to clinical overlap between the two disorders.
The present study aims to investigate the prevalence of *H. pylori* infection in patients with celiac disease and to evaluate its potential clinical impact, as well as possible interactions between the two conditions.

Materials and Methods

The study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Fırat University Faculty of Medicine (decision number 2024/11-05, dated 01.08.2024). The research protocol was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. This retrospective study was conducted at the Adult Gastroenterology Clinic of Fırat University Faculty of Medicine Hospital. Patients who had undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for suspected celiac disease prior to 2024 and who demonstrated both positive histological findings and serological test results in duodenal biopsies were included in the study. Biopsy samples obtained from these patients for *Helicobacter pylori* evaluation, in accordance with the Sydney protocol, were also assessed. Data on patients’ sex, age, presenting symptoms, comorbidities, medication use, and biochemical parameters were recorded using standardized clinical data collection forms and retrieved retrospectively from patient files.Ethical ApprovalThis study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Fırat University (Date: 01.08.2024, Decision No: 2024/11-05).Statistical AnalysisStatistical analyses were performed using SPSS v. 22 (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). The normality of the distribution of continuous variables was determined using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparisons between more than two groups. Following the Kruskal-Wallis test, the Post Hoc Dunn test was used for pairwise group comparisons. The chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were performed for categorical data analysis. Numerical data were expressed as Median (IQR), and categorical data as percentage (%). Spearman’s correlation test was performed to analyze correlations between continuous variables. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate risk factors, starting with a univariate analysis, followed by a multivariate analysis for variables found to be significant in the first stage. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.Reporting GuidelinesThis study was reported according to the STROBE guideline.

Results

Among the 216 patients with celiac disease included in the study, 174 (80.6%) were *Helicobacter pylori*–positive, while 42 (19.4%) were *H. pylori*–negative (Figure 1). The gender distribution did not differ significantly between the groups (*H. pylori*–positive: 114 women and 60 men; *H. pylori*–negative: 13 women and 29 men; p=0.664).
Histopathological examinations showed that edematous gastric changes were observed in only one *H. pylori*–negative patient (2.4%), a difference that was not statistically significant (p=0.116). Chronic gastritis was detected in 96% of the *H. pylori*–positive group and 95.2% of the negative group. The rates of intestinal metaplasia were 4% and 2.4%, respectively, with no significant difference between the groups.
According to the MARSH classification, stages 3A (31.6%) and 3B (31.6%) were the most common in *H. pylori*–positive patients, while stage 3B (38.1%) predominated in *H. pylori*–negative patients. No statistically significant difference was found in stage distribution (p=0.679).
In terms of clinical symptoms, dyspepsia was present in 81% of *H. pylori*–positive patients and 76.2% of negative patients (p=0.480). Diarrhea was reported in 21.3% of *H. pylori*–positive patients compared with 35.7% of negative patients, a statistically significant difference (p=0.049). Weight loss was observed in 10.3% of *H. pylori*–positive patients and 2.4% of negative patients, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.082) (Table 1).
In the study group, the *Helicobacter pylori* positivity rate was 80.56% and the negativity rate was 19.44% (Figure 1).

Discussion

According to our findings, although Helicobacter pylori infection is common among patients with celiac disease, it did not have a significant impact on histopathological findings or MARSH stage distribution. Nonetheless, the higher prevalence of diarrhea observed in H. pylori–negative patients suggests that the bacterium may exert an indirect influence on symptom severity.
The relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and celiac disease has been investigated in numerous studies, yet the findings remain inconsistent.12-13-14 For example, a large cross-sectional study by Lebwohl et al. demonstrated an inverse association between H. pylori and celiac disease, even after adjusting for sociodemographic factors, suggesting a possible protective role of the bacterium against celiac disease development.15 In addition, studies from regions with a high prevalence of H. pylori, such as Latin America, have reported celiac disease prevalence rates comparable to those in European populations, implying that the presence of H. pylori may not be a decisive factor in disease pathogenesis.16,17 Although H. pylori infection was common in our cohort, no significant association was observed. Taken together with previous evidence, these findings underscore the ongoing controversy regarding the role of H. pylori in celiac disease and highlight the need for larger, well-designed studies to clarify this relationship.
Histopathological examination remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of celiac disease, gastric lesions, and Helicobacter pylori infection.18 Previous studies have reported that duodenal intraepithelial lymphocytes may increase in patients with H. pylori gastritis and that this finding can be reversed following eradication therapy. Other studies have shown that the clinicopathological features of celiac patients infected with H. pylori do not differ significantly from those without infection, and that both groups demonstrate a similar response to a gluten-free diet. Moreover, it has been suggested that while mild duodenal lesions and lymphocytosis triggered by gastritis are more frequent in H. pylori–infected celiac patients, these changes are associated with lower rates of deep inflammation and stricture compared to other mucosal alterations.19 Some evidence also indicates that the increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes may, in certain cases, reflect an inappropriate host immune response to H. pylori. Consequently, it has been emphasized that screening for H. pylori infection and considering eradication therapy may be beneficial before initiating a gluten-free diet.20
Therrien and colleagues reported a prevalence of chronic gastritis of 31.3% among patients with celiac disease.21 Moreover, their observation of higher antibody titers in cases with gastritis—independent of the degree of villous atrophy—supports the lack of differences in MARSH stages, as the prevalence of chronic gastritis observed in our study was similarly high. In line with this, several studies have suggested that gastric pathologies may influence the duodenum and that Helicobacter pylori, after colonizing the gastric mucosa, can contribute to the development of duodenitis. Accordingly, it has been recommended that biopsies be obtained from both the stomach and duodenum in patients presenting with duodenal pathology.22
Consistent with our results, some studies have also reported that H. pylori infection is less frequent in celiac patients, and that duodenal damage—as assessed by Marsh score—tends to decrease with increasing H. pylori density.13,23 Villanacci et al. similarly observed milder villous atrophy in H. pylori–positive celiac patients, while another study found a higher prevalence of H. pylori in Marsh grade 1/2 lesions and a lower prevalence in Marsh grade 3 lesions.19,24 These findings suggest that H. pylori may exert a protective effect by mitigating histopathological damage. However, a multicenter study by Bayrak et al. did not confirm this relationship, reporting no significant association between H. pylori infection and duodenal injury.25

Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, it was conducted at a single center with a relatively small sample size. Second, due to its cross-sectional design, causal inferences regarding the relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and celiac disease cannot be established, which limits the generalizability of the findings. Third, socioeconomic and environmental factors—both of which are known to influence H. pylori prevalence and celiac disease—could not be evaluated because of the retrospective nature of the study. Fourth, reliance solely on histopathological methods for the diagnosis of H. pylori precluded comparison with alternative diagnostic techniques. Finally, as data on symptom severity were obtained retrospectively from patient records, the potential for subjectivity and recall bias should be taken into account.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the combined evaluation of our results and previous evidence suggests that Helicobacter pylori infection does not exert a decisive influence on histopathological progression in patients with celiac disease. Nevertheless, the potential role of H. pylori in modulating symptom severity or attenuating histological damage remains controversial. Further large-scale, prospective studies are warranted to clarify this complex relationship.

Abbreviations

CD: Celiac disease

References

  1. Caio G, Volta U, Sapone A, et al. Celiac disease: a comprehensive current review. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):142. doi:10.1186/s12916-019-1380-z
  2. Singh P, Arora A, Strand TA, et al. Global prevalence of celiac disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16(6):823-836. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2017.06.037
  3. Lebwohl B, Sanders DS, Green PHR. Coeliac disease. Lancet. 2018;391(10115):70-81. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31796-8
  4. Demirçeken FG. Gluten enteropatisi (çölyak hastalığı): klasik bir öykü ve güncel gelişmeler [Gluten enteropathy (celiac disease): a classic narrative and recent advances]. Güncel Gastroenteroloji Derg. 2011;15(1):58-72.
  5. 5. King JA, Jeong J, Underwood FE, et al. Incidence of celiac disease is increasing over time: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115(4):507-25.
  6. Rubio-Tapia A, Hill ID, Kelly CP, Calderwood AH, Murray JA. ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(5):656-676. doi:10.1038/ajg.2013.79
  7. Kamangar F, Sheikhattari P, Mohebtash M. Helicobacter pylori and its effects on human health and disease. Arch Iran Med. 2011;14(3):192-199.
  8. Suzuki H, Nishizawa T, Hibi T. Can Helicobacter pylori–associated dyspepsia be classified as functional dyspepsia? J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;26(suppl 3):42-45. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06629.x
  9. Du LJ, Chen BR, Kim JJ, Kim S, Shen JH, Dai N. Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy for functional dyspepsia: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(12):3486-3495. doi:10.3748/wjg.v22.i12.3486
  10. Toscano EP, Madeira FF, Dutra-Rulli MP, et al. Epidemiological and clinicopathological aspects of Helicobacter pylori infection in Brazilian children and adults. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2018;2018:8454125. doi:10.1155/2018/8454125
  11. Versalovic J. Helicobacter pylori: pathology and diagnostic strategies. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;119(3):403-412. doi:10.1309/5dtf5ht7nplna6j5
  12. Aydogdu S, Cakir M, Yuksekkaya HA, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection in children with celiac disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43(9):1088-1093. doi:10.1080/00365520802101846
  13. Ciacci C, Squillante A, Rendina D, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection and peptic disease in coeliac disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;12(12):1283-1287. doi:10.1097/00042737-200012120-00004
  14. Rostami-Nejad M, Villanacci V, Mashayakhi R, et al. Celiac disease and Helicobacter pylori infection association in Iran. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2009;101(12):850-854. doi:10.4321/s1130-01082009001200004
  15. Lebwohl B, Blaser MJ, Ludvigsson JF, et al. Decreased risk of celiac disease in patients with Helicobacter pylori colonization. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(12):1721-1730. doi:10.1093/aje/kwt234
  16. Corti RE. Helicobacter pylori: some epidemiological questions in Latin America after 25 years. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam. 2009;39(2):175-176.
  17. Gomez JC, Selvaggio GS, Viola M, et al. Prevalence of celiac disease in Argentina: screening of an adult population in the La Plata area. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96(9):2700-2704. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.04124.x
  18. Ghimpu S, Bozomitu L, Cardei E, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection in children with celiac disease. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2009;113(4):1093-1098.
  19. Villanacci V, Bassotti G, Liserre B, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(8):1880-1885. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00621.x
  20. Nahon S, Patey-Mariaud de Serre N, Lejeune O, et al. Duodenal intraepithelial lymphocytosis during Helicobacter pylori infection is reduced by antibiotic treatment. Histopathology. 2006;48(4):417-423. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2559.2006.02358.x
  21. Therrien A, Bernard G, Hetu PO, Bouin M. The coeliac stomach: a significant increase in tissue transglutaminase antibodies is associated with gastritis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;45(10):1285-1286. doi:10.1111/apt.14029
  22. Destek S, Gül VO. The relationship between nonspecific duodenitis and gastritis with Helicobacter pylori. Acibadem Univ Saglik Bilim Derg. 2020;11(3):505-509.
  23. Amlashi FI, Norouzi Z, Sohrabi A, et al. Association of Helicobacter pylori colonization and celiac disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021;16(3). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0241156
  24. Simondi D, Ribaldone DG, Bonagura GA, et al. Helicobacter pylori in celiac disease and in duodenal intraepithelial lymphocytosis: active protagonist or innocent bystander? Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2015;39(6):740-745. doi:10.1016/j.clinre.2015.03.005
  25. Bayrak NA, Tutar E, Volkan B, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection in children with celiac disease: multicenter, cross-sectional study. Helicobacter. 2020;25(5). doi:10.1111/hel.12691

Tables

Table 1. Pathological findings, MARSH classification, and distribution of symptoms in celiac patients according to H. pylori status

Additional Information

Publisher’s Note
Bayrakol MP remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional and institutional claims.

Rights and Permissions

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). To view a copy of the license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

About This Article

How to Cite This Article

Ali Çağrı Oral, Mehmet Yalnız, Furkan Kırsoy, Abdullah Mübin Özercan, Sedat Çiçek, İbrahim Halil Bahçecioğlu. Prevalence of helicobacter pylori infection and its histopathological correlation in adult celiac patients. doi:10.4328/ACAM.22930

Publication History

Received:
04.10.2025
Accepted:
23.10.2025
Published Online:
24.10.2025
Printed:
25.10.2025