Skip to content

Annals of Clinical and Analytical Medicine

E-ISSN: 2667-663X · Monthly · English

Pseudo-dissection of aorta in a infant

Pseudo-dissection of aorta

Clinical Image

An nine-month-old infant was admitted to our institution for investigation of tracheal obstructive symptoms: frequent episodes of respiratory tract infection, and cough (all symptoms since 6 months) and was treated medically in the pediatric ward. On admission, the patient’s blood pressure was 80/60 mmHg, and his pulse was 120 beats/min and rhythmic. His respiratory rate was 22 breaths/ min with normal vesicular breathing and no added sounds. ECG showed normal sinus rhythm. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed and it revealed normal ventricular and valvular dimensions and functions (Figure 1). Computed tomography angiography (CTA) was performed to investigate airway compression due to any vascular ring. After CTA observation, the patient was referred to our because appearence of aortic dissection in CTA (Figure 2). On control TTE after CT images revealed as normal again.
Imaging modalities as TTE, transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) CTA and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) play a critical role in rapid and accurate detection of aortic dissection.1-2 These images has markedly facilitated diagnosis and followup of dissections. For this particular condition, TTE and TOE usually allows to adequately visualize the aorta and can often diagnose involvement of the aortic root and proximal ascending aorta. CT or MRI is more useful involvement of the arch and descending aorta. CTA is typically the best imaging modality to use for rapid diagnosis. MRA is useful in the context of following patients with known aortic dissection. Contrast-TTE has similar accuracy to TOE in the diagnosis of type A aortic dissection.2 Each modality has its advantages and disadvantages. CTA may also occasionally exhibit false positives, showing a pseudo-dissection when there is streaking of contrast caused by motion artifact.2-3 Other conditions also may mimic a dissection such as mural thrombus, intramural hematoma, or a penetrating atherosclerotic ulceration.2
Transthoracic echocardiography suffices for assessment of the proximal and ascending aorta. The management of the patient and decision-making for accurate diagnosis should be based on clinical grounds addition to imaging modalities.

Declarations

Animal and Human Rights Statement

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to patient privacy reasons but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding

None.

References

  1. Echocardiography in aortic diseases: EAE recommendations for clinical practice. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010;11:645-658.
  2. Sentz A. The role of CTA, MRA, and sonography in aortic dissection. J Diagn Med Sonogr. 2015;31(4):235-240. doi:10.1177/8756479315586026
  3. Criado FJ, Coselli JS. Aortic dissection. Tex Heart Inst J. 2011;38(6):694-700.

Additional Information

Publisher’s Note
Bayrakol MP remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional and institutional claims.

Rights and Permissions

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). To view a copy of the license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

About This Article

How to Cite This Article

Muhammet Akyuz, Onur Isik, Tülay Demircan, Ali Rahmi Bakiler. Pseudo-dissection of aorta in a infant. J Clin Anal Med 2019;10(6). doi:10.4328/ACAM.5907

Publication History

Received:
21.05.2018
Accepted:
15.03.2019
Published Online:
22.03.2019
Printed:
01.11.2019