Skip to content

Annals of Clinical and Analytical Medicine

E-ISSN: 2667-663X · Monthly · English

Comparison of preincisional and postincisional 0.25% levobupivacaine infiltration in thyroid surgery

Infiltration anesthesia in thyroid surgery

Abstract

AimThe use of local anesthetics for pain management following neck surgery is not a well-studied field.MethodsSixty patients scheduled for thyroid surgery were randomly allocated into two groups. Wound infiltration with 0.25% levobupivacaine was performed before the incision in Group 1 and at the end of surgery in Group 2. Pain scores and side effects were followed for 24 hours. Intraoperative and postoperative analgesic consumption and first analgesic requirement time were recorded for each patient. Patient satisfaction was also evaluated at the end of 24 hours.ResultsLower pain scores, less analgesic consumption, later analgesic requirement and better patient satisfaction were obtained in the preincisional infiltration group.ConclusionLocal anesthetic infiltration is a safe, practical method of pain management following thyroid surgery. Preincisional wound infiltration gives better results.

Keywords

anesthesiainfiltrationlevobupivacainethyroidectomy

Additional Information

Publisher’s Note
Bayrakol MP remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional and institutional claims.

Rights and Permissions

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). To view a copy of the license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

About This Article

How to Cite This Article

Mürsel Ekinci, Birzat Emre Gölboyu, Ayşe Nur Yeksan, Onur Dülgeroğlu, Murat Aksun, Pınar Karaca Baysal. Comparison of preincisional and postincisional 0.25% levobupivacaine infiltration in thyroid surgery. J Clin Anal Med 2017;8(1):74-77. doi:10.4328/JCAM.4707

Publication History

Received:
16.06.2016
Accepted:
25.07.2016
Printed:
01.01.2017